Thursday, May 21, 2009

From oscillator strength to spontaneo...

From oscillator strength to spontaneous decay rate:

Approach I


Using
quantum mechanics, one can derive the relation between the oscillator
strength calculated from the absorption coefficient and the transition
matrix element |x|2. And the spontaneous decay rate is also decided by the matrix element |x|2, therefore, one can find the decay rate from the absorption coefficient.





f=\frac{2m\omega}{\hbar}|x|^2



eq=<br />f=\frac{2m\omega}{\hbar}|x|^2



while spontaneous decay rate:
A=\frac{e\omega^3}{3\pi\hbar c^3\epsilon_0 n^2}|x|^2



eq=A=\frac{e\omega^3}{3\pi\hbar c^3\epsilon_0 n^2}|x|^2






Therefore,




\frac{A}{f}=\frac{\omega^2e^2}{6m\pi c^3\epsilon_0n^2}







eq=\frac{A}{f}=\frac{\omega^2e^2}{6m\pi c^3\epsilon_0n^2}




Approach II: Judd-Ofelt theory,


f=\frac{2m\omega}{\hbar}S



eq=f=\frac{2m\omega}{\hbar}S



A=\frac{\omega^3e^2n^2}{\hbar c^3\pi\epsilon_0}S



eq=A=\frac{\omega^3e^2n^2}{\hbar c^3\pi\epsilon_0}S



Therefore,

\frac{A}{f}=\frac{\omega^2e^2n^2}{2mc^3\pi\epsilon_0}






eq=\frac{A}{f}=\frac{\omega^2e^2n^2}{2mc^3\pi\epsilon_0}

One can see that, in two approaches, there is an factor of 3n^4.

I am not so sure why two are not the same, but at this moment I tend to believe the second approach because it is specialized just for this case.

Usage

In a real experiment, oscillator strength can be found using partial sum rule:
The dimensionless oscillator strength is:
f=\frac{2c}{N_e\hbar \pi \omega_p^2}\int_{E_2}^{E_1}n\alpha dE

eq=f=\frac{2c}{N_e\hbar \pi \omega_p^2}\int_{E_2}^{E_1}n\alpha dE

Here
\omega_p^2=\frac{e^2 \rho}{m\epsilon_0}





eq=\omega_p^2=\frac{e^2 \rho}{m\epsilon_0}

[Reference:]

Kumar G.A. et al, Journal of Luminescence vol. 99, p. 141-148 (2002)







Conservation of

Conservation of Σλi

Description:

For a Helbert space (wave function subspace) {φi} defined by the operator O whose eigenvalues are λi, corresponding to wavefunction  φi.

Simply from linear algebra,
Σλi is actually the trace of the operator matrix O, which is of course conserved, no matter what unitary transformation of the {φi} is taken to form new set of basis, say {ψi}.

To generalize this, Σλin, is also conserved, because On also defines the space.

Example:

For a 4f electron multiplet, say, Nd3+, 4I9/2, ΣJz,in is conserved and of course Σμz,in is conserved too because they differ only by a factor of gμB

Just to give a few numbers,

sqrt(3Σμz,i2/5)=

3.6 μB(theoretical value)
3.4, 3.5 and 3.8 from measurement on crystal field split 4I9/2 multiplet.